Thursday, January 20, 2011

Knut Hamsun: Genius or Mad Man?

Knut Hamsun’s backgound as an impoverished boy who suffers at the hands both physically and mentally of his darkly religious Uncle seems to shape his novel’s character psyche. Hamsen, himself becomes an existentialist and despises his religious upbringing and questions the existence of God. And yet, he somehow portrays his protagonist in Hunger as a almost pitiful pious character who wishes to become closer to God by suffering. As Christ suffered he may feel he too can purge his sins and receive salvation by his self inflicted torture. He sins for no apparent reason so he can subconsciously design his own punishment. He actually seems to relish his own suffering like a self-inflicted masochist. His characters seem to have psychotic tendencies and schiitzphenic which all show the workings of a troubled past much like Hamsen himself. Hamsun affiliation with Nazi Germany and his hatred of England seem unclear but there is no evidence of anti Semitism, but it can be debated why his character on boarding the ship is enroute to England, a country that Hamsun clearly despises? Hamsun was considered a genius in his writings and was unique in that it was the character who himself would write his own plot as he goes along, “Yet, as if they were escaped convicts these heroes erase their tracks as they proceed, and this seems to be hapless rather than willed; they carry no continuous memory of what they have said or done from scene to scene. They seem only to be escaping themselves. “ Hamsun may have tried to escape from his own life through his character, and uses his novels as a form of  purposeful “Christian Perversion “His character walks around starving in a trance, talking to himself and inventing situations and lying to strangers and punishing himself for sins he has not committed. Hunger is a powerful, deeply disturbing and dark novel that explores the complex crevices of the human mind. There is a fine line between fantasy and realty and Hamsun’s character seems to be lost in the chasm in between these two states.

3 comments:

  1. Hi Sabrina,

    I thought it was interesting when you described the protagonist of Hunger as “pitiful pious character who wishes to become closer to God by suffering”. I always thought of him as criticizing Christianity and far from wanting to be close to God. I even thought that the main character was even agnostic.

    Can you explain more when you say:

    “Hunger is a powerful, deeply disturbing and dark novel that explores the complex crevices of the human mind. There is a fine line between fantasy and realty and Hamsun’s character seems to be lost in the chasm in between these two states.”

    Do you think that when the main character is extremely “abnormal” in our perspective, he is trapped in his own fantasy?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Julie, yes I think that there are many instances in the novel which show that the protagonist in Hunger is a deeply religious character and is deeply God fearing in all his actions. His high moral stance which prevents him from lying and cheating even in the face of starvation show that he would rather die than abandon his religious upbringing that forces him to follow the dictoms of Christianity. He makes many referances to God and Churches and grave yards that reveal his background and upbringing.
    My statement probes into the psychology of the human mind as seen in the view point of a psychiatrist. Often there is a fine line between what is actually happening in our lives and what our mind is thinking in terms of fantasy. Sometimes if a person is mentally disturbed as is the protagonist then reality and fantasy can merge, and a person can feel his imagination has become a part of his life. The human mind or brain is very complex and is little understood and a mentally ill person can fall victim of many diseases such as schizophenia and pschosis.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hmmm….. I think you have persuaded me to some degree that the protagonist is somewhat religious. Actually, I think everyone is religious or superstitious to some extent, especially when the time is desperate or want something very badly. For instances, when something goes wrong and there is no solution, only thing that you can do is just pray or hope. At that point, there is no loss to praying or hoping for a miracle, it is the only chance.

    I thought that all of those references to God, churches , and graveyards were part of Hamsum’s way of perversing Christianity. Despite protagonist’s encounter with them, he is still lost, not knowing where to go. Maybe, Hamsun was trying to deliver that believing in God even in a situation similar to what I described above may seem futile.

    ReplyDelete