Saturday, May 26, 2012

The Last Ever Blog - Blog Portfolio # 8 May 2012

Coverage


Hedda Gabler - An Unexplored Angle

3 Women 1 Goal - A Literary Device Comparison

Masking the Truth

Oleanna - Reel vs. Real

Theme in Oleanna - A Dangerous Mind

It's Just an allusion...

A Mischievous Imp, a Newspaper, and Me


I came across this paper on Hedda Gabler and was extremely excited by its fresh view point and insight on a play that I thought we had already analyzed so well in class. It is interesting to hear new angles to every opinion and whether  you agree or disagree debate and discussion allows for lively interaction.

Research

Hand, Nigel; “Psychoanalysis and the Space of the paly.” Yale University, N.p, n.d. Web. 20 May 2012. <http://modernism.research.yale.edu.wi>.

Discussion


Production vs. Script Oleanna


It always nice to read a blog and then see further points of discussion and to be able to add to it. Blogging can often be a lonely process but discussion allows you to be heard and be part of the process with like minded people. And whether you agree or disagree is immaterial as what counts is what you bring to the table.

Interaction


Jorina's Mask's

Jorina's introduction on masks brought several comments of which I was happy to add my opinion to.

Xenoblogging – Comment Primo

Adrienne's Art in Heidi

I had not really explored how art impacted Heidi or the play itself, so it was interesting to read the in depth research on the paintings by Adrienne. I also felt compelled to be the first to comment on why Heidi stands up for female artists and yet often fails to stand up for herself.


As I come to the end of my tenure at High School on the cusp of college life, I felt it poignant to include a memento of my memories in Delhi. I am about to embark on a new journey and my commute back and forth from the American Embassy School serves as a metaphor for the road I have already traveled. My memories at my school, teaching the Raju’s of this world at Teach India will remain with me forever.

Happy Birthday Ms. Morgan! :)

A Mischievous Imp, a Newspaper, and Me


Are we there yet? My little eight year old mind moaned ruing the earliness of the hour. I cuddled my snuggly Hello Kitty blanket, lovingly called my booboo (my first word apparently), still soft despite the frayed edges. It’s still 7:17am. Eyes closed, I rested my head against my car’s cold window on my journey to school, blissfully shunning the dusty pot holed roads and Delhi’s grey landscape. The chaos of merchants jostling with colorfully ornamented rickshaws, was mercifully drowned by the humming of my luxury car.
“Miss! Miss! Only 2 rupees.”
I sluggishly rubbed my eyes to see a scruffy little boy straight out of a Dickens novel, persistently knocking on my window. The three feet imp had a cheeky grin, and his overgrown mop fell lazily over his big brown eyes, that glinted with the wisdom of a boy beyond his tender years. His enthusiasm outshone his bedraggled state, as he eagerly waved a newspaper with a sales pitch that would have made any business graduate proud.
“No school today?” I quizzed him, handing over the loose change in my pocket.
“Nah,” he replied, tightly grasping the coins in his blistered hands that hinted at the life he had lead. “The streets are my school. I get by on my wits, only wish I could read the papers I sell.”
As the red light turned green I watched his fading figure waving emphatically at me. Here I was about to enter the gates of my privileged school, where I moaned about the mundane in my pampered existence. And here was this little entrepreneur, risking his life as he veered through the reckless traffic, through the pounding monsoons, bitter cold and relentless heat. And yet, instead of sympathy he garnered an instant likeability.
Raju became my friend and I looked forward to our daily anecdote exchanges. Worlds apart it was our similarities that drew us together; our unbridled passion for life, our shared love for the movie star ShahRukh, and our dreams.
Years passed and one day Raju never showed up, though I looked out for him daily. I never did find out what happened to him. Raju taught me to see my daily commute with new eyes, and each journey as my first. I noticed beauty and details in the mundane and learned to dance and laugh in the rain.
On the cusp of adulthood with the optimism of youth, I believe Raju and I will fulfill our dreams. We will both make it in this mixed up crazy world. Life is like a potholed journey; I have begun to smooth them out by mentoring the Rajus of the world. There are no dress rehearsals, this is opening night and I am going to give it my all, knowing it is my journey and not the destination that counts.
Am I there yet? Not yet, but I am on my way. My journey has just begun…I hope to see you there.

Thursday, May 24, 2012

Hedda Gabler - An Unexplored Angle


After so much reading and analysis of Hedda Gabler by Ibsen it was interesting to come across this paper which while still upholding and reiterating the basic accepted ideology on this play, still managed to offer some fresh approach and insight into this complex tale.

Hedda Gabler, Psychoanalysis And The Space Of (The ) Play by Nigel Hand explores Freudian, Kleinian and Winnicott’s key concepts with the view that Ibsen is a precursor of Freud and object-relations tradition in psychoanalysis.

It is interesting to sit back from the play and try and understand the mind of this deeply disturbed young woman, Ibsen’s female protagonist Hedda Gabler,  who ordinarily had everything to live for. The burning question arises; what when on in her mind to take her own life and that of her child. Was she psychotic or simply worn out by the pressures she faced?

The paper describes Ibsen as an anti-Romantic and that no text can be a single defining and exclusive context and that none of this would be possible without Freud. While this is debatable the paper states that Ibsen’s symbolism points to Ibsen’s early experiences which left his protagonists emotionally crippled and that Ibsen is an archeologist of the psyche. In fact the paper argues that the birth and development of psychoanalysis are foreshadowed and that Ibsen writes and thinks as a Freudian in Hedda Gabler (HG), as well as Klein and Winnicott as classified by Ibsen’s heroines preoccupation with the “beautiful”.

Hedda, is the quintessential tragic heroine who seems to actually revel in her self made gloom and doom. She is comfortable in her misery which she holds onto to like a comfort blanket. But what is her tragic flaw? Is this a tale of revenge or as the paper suggests is she a existential liberal tragedy Queen ? Is her death about release and freedom or the end of her grief ?  It is known Hedda is an alienated individual in conventional society who finds herself suffocating in her claustrophobic middle class atmosphere having abandoned her aristrocratic roots. I have talked in earlier blogs about the symbolism about the guns and her father’s portrait as reminders of her past and yet again I question why her mother is never mentioned. Of course all females may be abhorred by Hedda as a reminder of her bondage in a male domain. While all readings and interpretations clearly indicate Hedda is pregnant this paper only suggests there are hints and clearly points out that Tesman naively assumes Hedda and he have much in common while Hedda inwardly refutes this. The reader the paper also suggests will find it difficult to think of the two as a parental couple. I am not so sure that Tesman does think he has much in common with this aristocrat or that the play has a deep preoccupation with constituting the parental couple. I also was surprised to hear that the paper thinks Hedda knowingly pretended that Aunt Julies’s hat was the maid to simply humiliate her. Surely a high society woman would mistakenly think a middle class hat must be the maids as it does not fit into the norm of her high society ideals. Is Hedda being portrayed as the villain, both cold and manipulative by critics unfairly ? Is she being condemned without a trial? Are we as a society too quick to label and judge a woman who had just woken up and not found her bearings to find visitors or indeed does subsequent conversations with the conniving Brack reveal Hedda’s sinister side?

The play through relationship of Hedda and Thea shows perhaps a much less complex nature of simply jealousy over an old lover now belonging to Thea. This certainly brings us back to the theme of revenge as Hedda plots to destroy both Thea, Lovborg and their metaphorical child the manuscript that they created together. Hedda shoots herself when she realizes her husband and Thea are trying to piece the burned manuscript together from her notes as if this is the final straw. It is interesting theory though that while most critics argue that the play in an over romantic view that the central theme revolves around the protagonists revolt against middle class society, this paper says that this is only partially true. It goes on to state that “ The protagonist of the play is for all of us a deeply troubling dramatic creation-outside of Shakespeare and the Greeks, none more so perhaps. Northam attempts to escape from the challenging perplexity which Hedda Gabler arouses in our minds by producing a highly romanticized appraisal of her character and her actions. When he attributes to Ibsen’s heroine ‘a residually creative sense of human potentiality’ . Northam undoubtedly points to something which is at the heart of the play, but his belief that she also displays ‘serene self-confidence ‘is simply astonishing, for what is Hedda Gabler if not a deeply troubled soul? “.

Was the play centered more on the fate of the unborn child and is Hedda not the destroyer but the carrier of life. Are the symbolism of the burning of the manuscript deeper than killing the child but “ I am burning “ could denote in ambiguity that Hedda hates herself more. The paper states that by distortion of viewpoints we miss the real theme of the play, that the book –child theme shapes the play. The play suggests a triangular angle that has not been given attention to, “ triangular relationship “ (HG p.300). As quoted in the paper, “ The book-child theme is embedded in the more overt drama of sexual liaisons and rivalries[..] the play generates so many different subject positions we come to feel that it is being staged in some figurative space in which the potentialities of human nature are being very profoundly explored”. The paper goes into depth to show sexual jealousies and describes the book-child motif as the figure in the carpet, as the play is about adult sexual relationships which provides the setting for the modulations of the theme.

In section 2 of the paper creativity, envy and destructiveness is analyzed in depth. Hedda it states despises what she is drawn to which is a human nature trait. Hedda is drawn to Tesman’s good nature and his motherly concern but in an interesting twist the hat incident is interpreted as envy of what Tesman has with his Aunts caring and not just social disparity in their stations. This envy Hedda harbors borders on the psychopathic and is dangerous. It also explores Hedda’s objects such as the phallic symbols of the pistols as a substitute for a mother’s breasts. Further, the paper links her interest in Mrs Falk’s house beyond just materialism and a reason to marry Tesman but an association of a dead woman, absence and loss and happiness gone forever.

Section deals with fate or destiny and Hedda’s preoccupation with style such as the aesthetics of suicide. In fact “ the figure of the book child is a wonderfully imagined device for exploring the theme of the use of an object.[…] both literal and metaphoric[..] Hedda Gabler is unable to fashion a life is that in her personal world objects do not survive.” Ironically Tesman has the power to initiate her suicide ( her humiliation with Brack and Lovborg suicide aside ) by Tesman and Thea who she envies uniting to piece together the object she has destroyed. In her death and of her unborn child Hedda succeeds in leaving nothing else to envy.” If nothing is left to be reduced to nothing, something may begin to be. ‘A terrible beauty is born’ and a destiny is fatefully fulfilled”

The paper bought great insights depth and new ideas to the tried and tested formula. And while much is opinion based it leaves tremendous room for debate and discussion.

Hand, Nigel; “Psychoanalysis and the Space of the paly.” Yale University, N.p, n.d. Web. 20 May 2012. <http://modernism.research.yale.edu.wi>.

Saturday, May 5, 2012

3 Women 1 Goal - A Literary Device Comparison


The plays Heidi Chronicles,( HC), by Wendy Wasserstein, A Street Car Named Desire, (SCND), By Tennessee Williams and Hedda Gabler, (HG), by Henrik Ibsen  though set in different eras all  revolve around the trials and tribulations of their female protagonists, Blanche DuBois, Hedda Gabler, and Heidi Holland respectively. The central theme of the play essays these essentially independent women trying to find their way and discovering their individual identity within the confines of a society where the male dominates. Fantasy over reality, feminism, and power struggles are all key themes played out in different scenarios.

  While Hedda,  and Blanche draw upon metaphoric masks to often hide their free will and independence from a judging society and give the illusion of fitting in due to their Victorian and Southern American restrictions, (please see my earlier blog on masks ), this is contrasted by Heidi who is much less apologetic on her ambition and free will as she is a  coming of age baby boomer in a modern world with albeit present but lesser restrictions. This contrast is highlighted by outcome where Hedda, unable to come to terms with her life, tired of the illusion commits suicide as death means freedom and release.  On the other hand  Blanche  fears death ,whose delusional escapism world  leads her tragically to the asylum  when reality wins. On the other hand, Heidi  comes to peace with her lot and starts a new chapter where single at forty, adopts a child with forward thinking hope despite the grievances of her past.

 Both HG and SCND are set in short time frames with references to the past that has shaped them and their present fragile emotional states whereas the over twenty year time line of HC sets the theme of the changing role of women. Heidi is educated and intelligent trying to make it in a society dominated by men. This is shown in the chosen title which reveals the post world war 2 coming of age of women. Heidi from her naiveté as a school girl with political radicalism in the 1960’s,  militant feminism in the 1970’s to her betrayal and disillusion in the 1980’s where she evolves to a Columbia University  professor. Wassertein almost blames the women’s movement where women are seen as trivial and men as serious as Heidi finds her bearings in a changing world. In contrast Blanche and Hedda are more obvious victims.  The title where Hedda holds onto her maiden name symbolizes her independence as does the awe she exudes to the other characters while in SCND the title symbolizes her journey as an allegoric trajectory of her life to achieve her desires but in a ironic foreshadow of her suicide she takes another streetcar named cemeteries to Eysian fields ( Greek allusion  both which allude to the death of her soul. )

In setting;  SCND is confined to a tiny apartment with the street visible showing the metaphor of Blanche being unable to leave her real world problems as she resides as an intruder in a hostile confined environment. Similarly HG is set in a few rooms in a home which ironically she pretended she wanted as the perfect wife but in reality is not her sanctuary but her incarceration as she spends her time rearranging the furniture in her frustration. In contrast HC, moves through varies settings as the story and Heidi progresses in maturity.

The past is a defining theme as shown in the guns in HG which not mere toys but represent a happier care free symbol of her former life and ironically allow her to escape in death. The guns also represent her masculinity in a phallic symbol. The portrait of her father and the piano link her to her past and are shifted as they no longer belong in her new life. The curtains act as a motif to shut out the world and live out the darkness of her heart and in her play acting close the final act and grand finale of her suicide. Flowers that she rearranges also acts as a motif for Hedda’s death and future while the reference to a Mexican woman selling flowers for the dead  and Blanche’s  reaction of horror in scene 9  of SCND foreshadows Blanche’s figurative death.  Similarly, in SCND Blanche hides the loss of her youth and beauty from Mitch  in dim light as she shuns the present and lives in her former glory until forced by Mitch to stand under the light. This symbolizes her regressive nature to hold on to better times where she lived in high society with a husband she loved, before her loved ones died and her stately home is taken away. The motif of light such as the covering of the lamp with a lantern show the metaphor that light is her innocence and youth and dark her maturity and disillusion. In contrast Heidi lives far more for the present and future though she too haunted by ghosts of the past and tries to escape her mistakes by taking a job in Minnesota until persuaded otherwise by Peter as he looks at her past as symbolized by boxes of records and books. Light and dark do not appear as metaphors in HC.

Music plays prominence as a symbol in all three plays. In HG in the piano representing the music of happier times while in HC the music chronicles her life and the era and mirrors her feelings like “Respect “ playing in the background during the feminist meeting in the church. In SCND only Blanche can hear the Varsouviana polka which haunts her guilt at her husband’s suicide and her singing of “Paper Moon” drowns out Stanley’s vocal ranting of her unsavory character and adds to her delusion that her lies are believable.

All three plays show the protagonists dependence on men as a theme,  like a damsel in distress and the characterization of the men as foils add to this. Blanche desperately wants to marry Mitch for security and deludes herself on a rich savior of Shep Huntleigh to rescue her. Hedda has lost her lover Lovborg and is forced to rely on Tesman as a husband and caretaker  after her father General Gabler’s demise. Though Heidi is the most self reliant of the trio she still relies on the crumbs given out to her by Scoop, waiting for his calls and being defined by him only to be betrayed, and leans on the gay Peter for as an emotional crutch. Peter even remarks on the allusion of Peter and Heidi in the Swiss novel as the little girl lost, but the contrast is that ultimately Heidi rescues herself where Blanche and Hedda fail. All novels show the theme of women as sexual beings to be used by men like the womanizing Scoop. In HC women are described as meat and in SCND Stanley throws a piece of meat in scene 1 and in the end rapes Blanche. Hedda too is used sexually by the men in her life such as Lovborg, Tesman and the Judge who wants an extramarital affair with her. However, while Blanche and Hedda exploit their femininity and sexuality for manipulative purposes, Heidi is much less feminine in her approach relying on her personality than body.

The baby and  love and sexuality act  as a symbol in all three plays where it is positive in HC where the adoption represents a new beginning of pure love but in SCND Stella’s pregnancy reminds her of everything Blanche never had with her husband and the ticking biological clock as she desperately searches for a husband. More dramatically the pregnant Hedda hides and hates her pregnancy as it will simply further imprison her in a loveless marriage and her suicide ends this burden. Taking this further the manuscript is the metaphor for the ‘baby’ of Lovborg and Thea and her jealousy comes to a head as she burns it to destroy their happiness. The fire in fact foreshadows Hedda’s  death and contrasts her lack of passion and warmth towards others. Heidi and her group burn lingerie to rid themselves of sexual beings. The reference to vine leaves by Hedda  for Lovborg acts as the allusion of  Dioysus the Greek god of partying and fertility as she fantasizes about in the old alcoholic days where he would rebel from society taboos to be with her. In a situational irony she ends up encouraging Lovborg’s death despite her desire for him, with her gun having killed his ‘child’ the manuscript while rejecting domestic bliss with Tesman as symbolized with her careless attitude towards the slippers bought by his aunt. On the other in SCND the allusion to the Browning poem and the lighter represent Blanche’s lost love which has increased post her husband’s death. On the other hand despite Heidi’s love for Scoop she shies away from commitment despite her jealousy at his marriage and the recurring motif of art reveals her rebellion against traditional mating rituals as she fights for women representation in the art world.

The three plays are centrally the journey of three very different women tied by their desire to be free. The path to their self discovery, liberation and outcome may be varied but all three women show their solidarity in their convictions which they hold onto till the end.